But they will use it to direct people to wher… RyanSmithAT: Samsung does not use social media for direct announcements.If it's such an important show, it literal… RyanSmithAT: RT I'm endorsing Rob's endorsement, we need to stop having CES so early in the year.RyanSmithAT: That comment is based on actual retail (market) prices, not MSRPs.RyanSmithAT: So what you're saying is that the photos aren't a security risk because of the intel inside?.IanCutress: Check the last year and a half of financial calls from AMD and Intel and others.I swear I purchased most of these before I had a smartph… IanCutress: Finally opening boxes from the house move three years ago.IanCutress: Write a column a week, and then at the end of the year put half of them in a book.Given the level of performance Iris Pro offers, I don't see many situations where AA will be enabled, but it's clear that this is a weak point of the microarchitecture. Iris Pro goes from performance competitive with the GT 650M to nearly half its speed once you enable 4X MSAA. I also included GFXBenchmark 2.7 (formerly GL/DXBenchmark) as another datapoint for measuring the impact of MSAA on Iris Pro: Is Intel's performance here the result of all of these benchmarks being lighter on Intel's weaknesses, or is this an indication of what's possible with more driver optimization? Obviously none of this has any real world impact, but it is very interesting. Ranging from tying the GT 650M to outperforming it. It turns out, Iris Pro does incredibly well in all of the 3DMarks. Given what we've seen thus far, and Intel's relative inexperience in the performance GPU space, I wondered if Iris Pro might perform any differently here than in the games we tested. We don't use 3DMark to draw GPU performance conclusions but it does make for a great optimization target.

Iris pro vs 750m